Welcome to Anti

The Anti American Propaganda Page

Latest Anti American Propaganda News

TheSpec.com - Opinions - Avatar anxiety - Hamilton Spectator

Now that Avatar has been named the best motion picture drama by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, making it a front-runner in the Oscar sweepstakes, does it mean the terrorists have won? Judging from the anger the movie has generated in some ...

What others say: 'Avatar' and conservatives - Athens Banner-Herald

Filmmaker James Cameron's science-fiction epic, which is on track to be the highest-grossing movie ever, has been widely derided as anti-American, liberal propaganda. That's funny, we thought it was just formulaic - if incredibly artful - escapist ...

Secret ‘Jesus’ Codes Being Inscribed On Military Scopes: The ... - RIGHTPUNDITS.COM

Listen to Maddow wax ridiculously about how Trijicon is spawning anti-American propaganda and spurring Al Qaeda recruiting with the “Jesus rifles.” Absolutely priceless.

Stationing of Patriot Missiles Near Russian Border in Poland Threatens ... - Jamestown Foundation

The fact that the Patriot missiles are a defensive weapon will hardly stop a surge of anti-American propaganda in Russia. Last month Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov gave NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen a draft proposal for a new security ...

China Tries to Steer Public Opinion on Web Issue - Wall Street Journal

BEIJING -- China has hardened its line against U.S. criticisms of its Internet policies following an initial period of restraint, with a coordinated rebuttal in its state media that seemed targeted toward a domestic audience. Dozens of commentaries ...

Afghan troops vital cog in anti-Taliban surge - YAHOO!

... now professional soldiers using state-of-the-art American weaponry. He has also learned valuable lessons in planning and strategy, as well as how to "manage information" -- the military term for countering Taliban propaganda. He says he believes ...

No Answer to Terrorism - Canada Free Press

Bin Laden’s latest message, real or memorex, is an uncomfortable reminder for the current ruling party of the United States that terrorism did not go away just because they found it inconvenient or thought global warming was a much more crucial ...

Did Osama Know About Christmas Day Terror Attempt? - Fox40

WASHINGTON - Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the Christmas Day attempt to blow up an American commercial jet in an audiotape broadcast Sunday on Arab television. U.S. intelligence officials quickly raised doubts about Bin ...

Other Views: 'Avatar' torture for conservatives - Appeal-Democrat

Another View: ‘Avatar’ — torture for conservatives - Hanford Sentinel

Open Question: Are we already living in George Orwell's supposedly fictional '1984' society?

If I say anything against the excessive immigration in the UK, I'm a "racist". If I say anything against the excessive influence of Israeli-lobbyists* in the UK, I'm an "anti-semite". If I say anything about the EU Constitution being changed to the Lisbon Treaty so the people can't vote on it, I'm a "conspiracy theorist". When the USA or UK invade a country, kill the people there, take over their government and steal their oil, this is "bringing Democracy to the Middle-East". We are encouraged to scream with rage at our tv screens whenever we are shown the face of a "terrorist" or any leader of a country allegedly doing the West 'wrong'. For example, when US-trained Georgian troops attacked Russia, our Media remained silent until Russia responded in defence, then it was all over the tv and newspapers that Russia had invaded Georgia! If I say anything about this, I'm "anti-American". I see tv reporters on British news shows every week, interrupting and hushing-up anyone who tries to speak the truth. The BBC in particular, is quite obviously a most horribly biased state-controlled propaganda machine on par with 'Fox News' in the USA. Not only in its News, but also in its documentaries and even its soaps. One difference is that in Orwell's '1984' society, sex was shown as suppressed as it was in the Victorian times in order to reduce the population - since that didn't work, they have encouraged excessive sex to be a means of pleasure rather than reproduction; offering condoms at supermarket check-outs like sweets and offering abortions as easy as having a tooth taken out. So if I choose to have sex with strangers every night, dress like a prostitute, never get married or have kids, then hoorah! I'm an "independant" woman. Now why does all this make me feel sick and hollow to the core?? Does anyone else feel this too? *If anyone is interested, the Dispatches documentary "Inside Britain's Israel Lobby" has now been posted on Youtube and can be seen in 5 parts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTC4jbZ7hTY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN7mlUoKVDM&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH0KM68ax5E&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1tPulSggyA&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDzQJdQa0wY&feature=relatedRich - That's my point, it's not the 'future', we're already living in it.Red Star of Truth - You've missed the point.N. Lane - Who said anything about the BNP??!! Hahaha! You've just proved my point! So if I disagree with excessive immigration, I'm a BNP supporter now, am I?? Are you aware that the whole Georgia-Russian war was about immigration? I suggest you learn more about politics before you make such uninformed Orwellian comments.George S - Yes I forgot about the term, "peace-keepers". They did nothing during the genocide in Rwanda.chris at hornchurch - Also, these new 'Academy' schools being established across the UK are allowed to follow their OWN curriculum and are not responsible to the State. The potential of this for corruption in the future is horrific.Kristina - This is not only about the UK, Americans are well into their Orwellian society already with their "Free Speech Zones". Don't kid yourself that America, Australia, France, Germany, etc. are not in the same boat here.Sugar - Do you 'think' at all??! Or do you walk around like a zombie like most people do?tokolak - The problem is that you are deceived into thinking you are free. If ever you dispute the Government, you'll soon find those invisible prison bars around you become apparent. You think you have a choice? Yes, you can choose from what they choose you to choose. You think what they tell you to think. So how do you explain the "Free Speech Zones" in the USA then??! Do some research please.Jim J - "Congratulations"??! Shall I throw a party then? How about some intelligent suggestions about how we are going to deal with this??Wolfie - You've proved my point again. I'm not talking about immigration but EXCESSIVE immigration and you clearly do not understand about immigration in the UK - or the rest of the world for that matter. "2 million" people are not "most people in this country" (do you know the population statistics for the UK?) and please tell me how effective those protests have been? Distortions in politics have never been so bad since the 1950s. Certainly people were much more knowledgable about politics before that time and it was hard to pull the wool over their eyes. Yes, it's good to have the freedom to dress like a prostitute and have sex with strangers - but don't you have ANY moral standards??! Can't you see the damage this causes society? And finally, NO I AM NOT A BNP SUPPORTER!!!! I am Conservative but am considering voting for UKIP.booboo - Let me tell you something. Do you know where the first British brigade went to at the start of World War II? BASRA. It has ALWAYS been about getting oil. more

Resolved Question: Why are unpatriotic, anti-american, communist propaganda films such as Avatar allowed to be shown in public?

Anti american movies should be outlawed. We are the defenders of the free world, bring people the superior American way and make a decent profit at the same time for our leaders. Films that show the military or our way of life in a negative light should be outlawed. more

Resolved Question: When Will The Democrats Wake UP and Smell The B.S.?!?

A very Wise Person Once Said,...." A lie will be 1/2 way around the world Before The Truth gets it's shoes on." This has been the strength behind any and all of the GOP success! The Republicans in Washington and the special interest groups that own them are very skilled at blaming the Dems for the disasters they have caused, The collapse of the economy , high unemployment and the deficit are 3 prime examples. The GOP, and Special Interest Groups flood the TV, Radio, newspapers with lies and false accusations that when repeated enough times become Fact in the minds of those who don't think for themselves or just have a need to feed on all things "Anti Obama" When Will the Democrats start rebutting the GOP Propaganda machine with the same energy and vigor? I can and do research the truth for myself, but how many Americans just believe what they are told ? more

Resolved Question: Is RT(Russia Today) network not one of the most anti-american propaganda news you have seen?

Everything I see on the site is in a heavy Pro Russia bias, anti-America. A Lot of things about CIA and Georgia conflict and just everything is about US this US that. like its all our fault according to the Kremlin controlled network. http://www.youtube.com/user/russiatoday?blend=1&ob=4 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2009/dec/18/russia-today-advertising-television http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/18/russia-today-propaganda-ad-blitz more

Resolved Question: is this another hoax ?

AIDS: The great medical con, explained by David Icke by David Icke from www.DavidIcke.com (NaturalNews) HIV does NOT cause AIDS. HIV does not cause anything. A staggering statement given the hype and acceptance by the scientific establishment and, through them, the public that the HIV virus is the only cause of AIDS. HIV is a weak virus and does not dismantle the immune system. Nor is AIDS passed on sexually. There are two main types of virus. Using the airplane analogy, you could call one of these virus strains a "pilot" virus. It can change the nature of a cell and steer it into disease. This usually happens very quickly after the virus takes hold. Then there is the "passenger" virus which lives off the cell, goes along for the ride, but never affects the cell to the extent that it causes disease. HIV is a passenger virus! So how on earth did it become the big boogy man virus of the world? The person who announced that HIV caused AIDS was an American, Doctor Robert Gallo. He has since been accused of professional misconduct, his test has been exposed as fraudulent, and two of his laboratory executives have been convicted of criminal offenses. Tens of millions of people are tested for HIV antibodies every year and Dr Gallo, who patented his "test", gets a royalty for every one. Luc Montagnier, Gallo's partner in the HIV-causes-AIDS theory, has since admitted in 1989: "HIV is not capable of causing the destruction of the immune system which is seen in people with AIDS". Nearly 500 scientists across the world agree with him. So does Dr Robert E Wilner, author of the book 'The Deadly Deception. The Proof That Sex And HIV Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS'. Dr Wilner even injected himself with the HIV virus on a television chat show in Spain to support his claims. Other doctors and authors come to the same conclusions, among them Peter Duesberg PhD and John Yiamouyiannis PhD, in their book, 'AIDS: The Good News Is That HIV Doesn't Cause It. The Bad News Is "Recreational Drugs" And Medical Treatments Like AZT Do'. That's a long title, but it sums up the situation. People are dying of AIDS because of the treatments used to "treat" AIDS! It works like this. Now it is accepted by the establishment and the people that HIV causes AIDS, the system has built this myth into its whole diagnosis and "treatment". You go to the doctor and you are told your HIV test was positive(positive only for the HIV antibodies, by the way, they don't actually test for the virus itself). Because of the propaganda, many people already begin to die emotionally and mentally when they are told they are HIV positive. They have been conditioned to believe that death is inevitable. The fear of death leads them to accept, often demand, the hyped-up "treatments" which are supposed to stop AIDS occurring. (They don't.) The most famous is AZT, produced by the Wellcome organisation, owned, wait for it, by the Rockefellers, one of the key manipulating families in the New World Order. AZT was developed as an anti-cancer drug to be used in chemotherapy, but it was found to be too toxic even for that! AZT's effect in the "treatment" of cancer was to kill cells - simple as that - not just to kill cancer cells , but to kill cells, cancerous and healthy. The question, and this is accepted even by the medical establishment, was: would AZT kill the cancer cells before it had killed so many healthy cells that it killed the body? This is the drug used to "treat" HIV. What is its effect? It destroys the immune system, so it is CAUSING AIDS. People are dying from the treatment, not the HIV. AIDS is simply the breakdown of the immune system, for which there are endless causes, none of them passed on through sex. That's another con which has made a fortune for condom manufacturers and created enormous fear around the expression of our sexuality and the release and expansion of our creative force. Many deaths incorrectly attributed to AIDS What has happened since the Great AIDS Con is that now anyone who dies from a diminished immune system is said to have died of the all encompassing term, AIDS. It is even built into the diagnosis. If you are HIV positive and you die of tuberculosis, pneumonia, or 25 other unrelated diseases now connected by the con men to "AIDS", you are diagnosed as dying of AIDS. If you are not HIV positive and you die of one of those diseases you are diagnosed as dying of that disease, not AIDS. This manipulates the figures every day to indicate that only HIV positives die of AIDS. This is a lie. Many people who die from AIDS are not HIV positive and the reason that the figures for AIDS deaths have not soared as predicted is that the overwhelming majority of people diagnosed HIV positive have never developed AIDS. Why? Because HIV has nothing whatsoever to do with AIDS. Anything that breaks down the immune system causes AIDS and that includes so-called recreational drugs. The vast majority of AIDS more

Voting Question: Why do people accuse me of not "understanding the war on terror"?

I want to attack the country that 14 of the 17 (9/11) hijackers came from.. I want to attack the country where Bin Laden came from.. The country that has been proven to promote anti American rhetoric and propaganda, where the royalty actually funded this propaganda.. While your current president bows to them, and the previous president kisses them and holds their hands.. I don't agree with the start of the war in Iraq, but see the need to finish it.. I fully agree with Afghanistan and even support strategic bombings in Al Queda strongholds in Pakistan.. Iran, Syria, Yemen, (Insert other country here) is not a current threat.. Iraq was not a threat and we should have never been there... Tell me where I'm wrong.. And how I don't understand this war... ??Sophie = How exactly are they working with us?? What are they doing? We KNOW.. They fund anti American rhetoric.. This is out.. If they like us so much, why is it always their people that are so willing to kill themselves to kill us??Braden = I agree to a point.. But 14 out of 17?? Seriously?? I think it's more than just a coincedence.. The royalty is funding to teach their hatred... We know this already... Backstabbers.. Take them out politically, if that fails... Militarily..63vette = Thanks... I do disagree tho... I think it's their leadership who created these terrorists.. That is the entire reason I make this point.. They are creating more and more waves of future threats.. And we need to rid them of that power...Aging hippie douche = Read the comments.. They have attacked us... Read behind the lines... They are not our friends...Jenny = Don't mind Sophie.. We love the Aussies... Ya'll is awesome!! ;)BTW aging hippie = Isn't Iraq the birthplace of Abraham?? Just sayin.. We didn't seem to take that under consideration before.. Doesn't matter...Scott = I agree with your point.. But the Saudi's created Bin Laden.. And they created these 14 hijackers.. Cut the head off the snake, and the body will die... The Saudi's are creating more haters as we speak... Stop it! more

Resolved Question: What are your thoughts on the Anti-immigration Movement?

Why can't groups stand up for these kinds of beliefs without having to spread lies, racism, hate and violence? ============================= The Anti-Immigration Movement The immigration debate in the United States has been marked by racist propaganda, bogus statistics about immigrants and wild conspiracy theories — all of which combine to dehumanize Latino immigrants and falsely portray them as disease-carrying, job-stealing criminals invading our country. This xenophobic rhetoric — echoes of the scapegoating of new immigrants throughout American history — has seeped steadily into the mainstream, taken up by right-wing politicians and popular media figures like Lou Dobbs. The myths and conspiracy theories about immigrants often originate within racist extremist organizations. And the vitriol heard daily on talk radio and cable TV has helped nurture a movement of anti-immigration groups as well as traditional hate groups. http://www.splcenter.org/intel/immigrant.jsp more

Resolved Question: Why does the right wing want the terrorists to win so Obama can loose?

Closing the embassy in Yemen is a clear indication that Yemeni and American forces are planning strikes against Al Qaeda targets in that country. Why do some extremist right wingers seem to think that this is a bad thing? Some are claiming this is a sign of weakness... are they that uninformed to the procedures a country takes before a strike, or are they just spreading anti-American propaganda? Are they rooting for the terrorists and not for our country in the name of partisan politics?RZ1971: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2549913/us_embassy_in_yemen_closes_as_strikes.html?cat=62 more

Resolved Question: Was the Avatar just a good movie, or an anti-America propaganda piece.?

I recently saw the Avatar. While it was a good movie, I immediately recognized the (sky-walkers - humans) as representing Americans. The Corporation wanting a valuable mineral, the war monger caucausain military man. the Indigenous people worshiping and under standing their mother (the planet). THe sky walkers taking what they wanted by force, and destroying mother nature and the primatives (who fought with arrows) to get what they wanted. Is this a propaganda piece relative to global warming and returning us the the 18th Century Standard of Living. Is this not what the terrorists and Obama Administration is saying about "evil" America. How much of this stuff is buried in stories in our children's school curriculum. Teaching Lib philosophy, including whites are evil, America is evil, no moral certainties, God does not exist, the evils to Indians, etc., without actually saying the words?For those that point to slavery, or settling in America - some of you Libs are white - did you or your ancestors own slaves? Neither did mine. For the most part, you are speaking of the ancestors of the Elitists, who push the blame onto common folks. We all have rights, that the Elitists want to remove. White, black, Mexican, Asian, Christian, Mormon, Muslim, Jewish, Atheist. We are all the people, we all are equal. Are you libs just puppets, letting the Elitists take the focus off what they do?Hasn't the elitists of every race owned slaves at some point in history. Isn't the Elitists the 1% thatcontrol almost all, and come from every race and country? more

Resolved Question: How Right Was Cheney?

All year former Vice President Dick Cheney has been bird-dogging the president on his anti-terrorism policies. From the get-go, Cheney has charged Obama with foolishly abandoning the policies that worked to keep America safe and reverting to a pre- 9/11 mentality. He made that argument once again today: As I’ve watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war. He seems to think if he has a low-key response to an attempt to blow up an airliner and kill hundreds of people, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if he gives terrorists the rights of Americans, lets them lawyer up and reads them their Miranda rights, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if we bring the mastermind of Sept. 11 to New York, give him a lawyer and trial in civilian court, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core al-Qaeda-trained terrorists still there, we won’t be at war. He seems to think if he gets rid of the words, ‘war on terror,’ we won’t be at war. But we are at war and when President Obama pretends we aren’t, it makes us less safe. Why doesn’t he want to admit we’re at war? It doesn’t fit with the view of the world he brought with him to the Oval Office. It doesn’t fit with what seems to be the goal of his presidency — social transformation — the restructuring of American society. President Obama’s first object and his highest responsibility must be to defend us against an enemy that knows we are at war. Liberals have sneered that Cheney was exaggerating or misreading the Obami’s approach to terrorism. But at each turn — the plan to close Guantanamo and send detainees to places like Yemen, the release of the enhanced interrogation memos (but only selectively), and the decisions to cease enhanced interrogation techniques and give KSM a civilian trial — the Obama team has in effect proved Cheney’s point. What about the voters? The public has consistently registered disapproval of Obama’s approach. Like Cheney, they don’t want the CIA investigated and would prefer we use necessary interrogation techniques to save lives. They don’t think it’s a good idea to give KSM a forum to spew his jihadist propaganda and obtain access to classified materials. However, the voters have lacked a concrete example to demonstrate the consequences of the Obami’s approach. Now they see where it leads — a laconic response from the president, a terrorist sitting mute in jail rather than spilling what he knows to interrogators, and dogged determination by the administration to avoid labeling these attacks as part of a worldwide war waged by Islamic terrorists. Say what you will but Cheney has made his point — or Obama has made it for him. And the voters will decide whether “not Bush” is really such a smart approach to keeping them safe more

Resolved Question: Were you cheering when they slaughtered US military personnel in Avatar?

Praise Allah, James Cameron's Avatar is a great piece of anti-American propaganda and the most expensive Al Qaeda recruitment video ever produced. When they were showing the Na'vi slaughtering American soldiers I howled and praised along with the rest of theater and we all clapped after every last American capitalist imperial was brutally slaughtered. Capitalism is evil except when it funds James Cameron's great works of propaganda. more

Resolved Question: They are even calling Avatar anti-American propaganda in Europe--what you think about that?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100020721/avatar-the-most-expensive-piece-of-anti-american-propaganda-ever-made/ more

Resolved Question: How is racism spread?

From what I have personally seen, racism is spread by a type of "RECRUITING" as many people as possible into a certain way of thinking that in the end, produces or reinforces poisionous, racist sentiment and reactions in that person. You could look upon it as being a type of recruiting into a 'cult of hate'. Individuals and organized online hate groups, spread racism by fear-mongering...making people afraid to actually be associated with the hated group--as if it will somehow "stigmatize" them too. Fear-mongering, they continually point out "the differences" and make the hated group seem "untouchable" or "undesirable" in some way, and to be avoided or isolated from the rest of society. This is what the minister of propaganda Josef Goebbles did in Nazi Germany to the Jews. He used insulting, dehumanizing words and images to tap into Germany's already anti-Semitic sentiments, until hatred towards the Jews was finally full-blown. Could this happen here, today, in the United States to Black Americans, especially to black women? I ask this in part, being alarmed at so much anti-Black racist sentiments being expressed across parts of the internet. Have you seen this too? What are your feelings about it?End, have you ever seen one of those old photos of the lynchings with mobs of people surrounding the poor victims? (http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/lynching2.jpg) Well, my dad once told me that the devil never changes, and I believe him. Racism never changes except in how much more crafty it becomes at it. Say for example today if these same kind of racists (seen in that photo) want to lynch a victim of their hatred, they don't necessairly need to go to all that fuss and be so messy about it. According to what some people are saying over the internet, all the racist has to do today, is to pull out some kind of electronic device and torture the object of their hatred that way. Or hack into their computer, invading their privacy or attempt to mess up their reputation--like many believe the media did to Michael Jackson. Yea, my dad was right. The devil hasn't changed at all. Thanks for your input. more

Resolved Question: Anti-GITMO folks: Are you outraged at this obvious violation of the Geneva Convention?

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091225/D9CQBCL00.html Taliban release video of captured US soldier A statement read by a Taliban spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid, appears at the end of the video and renews demands for a "limited number of prisoners" to be exchanged for Bergdahl. The statement says that more American troops could be captured. The Geneva Conventions, which regulate the conduct of war between regular armies, bar the use of detainees for propaganda purposes and prohibit signatories from putting captured military personnel on display. As an insurgent organization, the Taliban are not party to the treaty. Statements from captives are typically viewed as being made under duress. The insurgents also released a video of Bergdahl a few weeks after he was captured. In the July 19 video, Bergdahl appeared downcast and frightened. I haven't seen any posts condemning the Taliban for their egregious violation of the same Geneva Convetion YOU accuse us of violating. Why is that?Never in my life have I ever heard such ignorant answers as Agent Orange, RaTz, Aoife, and oimwoomwio. Honestly, I got down on my knees and thanked Almighty God that people like this weren't in charge of this country during WWII. How can you fight a war with both hands tied behind your back? Agent Orange, yes, the Taliban was funded by the US, TWENTY YEARS AGO when they were fighting the Russians. We also funded Iran 50 years ago. You also realize that the Attorney General of the United States has stated publicly that if those who are tried in U.S. courts are aquitted, they will NOT be released. Do I want to treat them like animals? I want them treated the way they deserve. According to the Geneva Convention that you guys so often quote, they are ENEMY COMBATANTS, not entitled to protection under the Geneva Convention. You've NEVER heard a conservative say about the poor "he got himself into this mess, it's not my problems".You've heard it said about those who refuse to help themselves out of their mess.RaTz and Aoife, You are idiots. No other way to describe it. Yes, this is a real question. You'll condemn us for placing prisoners in a prison, with the proper religious diet, new copies of their religious books, prayer rugs, and prayer times. To you think the Taliban gave Bergdahl those items?Lastly oimwoomwio, Where to begin? I refer you to the above addition. You're right, we sooooo mistreated those prisoners. Do you REALLY think that Bergdahl did that video tape of his own free will? Do you think that he wasn't beated and tortured into doing it? You're right, no brainer, really. more

Resolved Question: Why is some prominent black left wing Americans flipping on a long standing position on Cuba?

backbrief for question:my dad is a true anti Castro warrior as he fought in the "war against the bandits" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escambray_Rebellion So i fully understand what really happened and who is what, no propaganda here. My dad was there as a teen when Castro took power and almost lost his life now after 50 years of communist oppression i see this story: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/79892.html Noteably among them Jeremiah Wright the same guy that said "GD America". and yes Cuba is around 80% black yet Casto has always treated them like crap with token positions and never letting them hold any power,also Gen Batista was a black man as much as he was a shady man.(the man Castro led his revolution against) so as i welcome them to the cause what took them 50 years to figure out Cuba is run by communist thugs?so thats the best you got lil young commie lol come on answer the question and face your red rootsim going to go into a long story of near death battles with Soviet officer led overwelming force of T-54s and Migs dropping tons of bombs on his group red however my dads family had a large farm and owned some land thats it no other stake than that. more

Resolved Question: Ahmadinejad denies Iran nuclear bomb trigger tests --- what do you think?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8425704.stm If it is long, don't read it, just tell me what you think! Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has dismissed as a US forgery a document allegedly showing plans by Tehran to test a nuclear bomb trigger. Well Iran has been set up before by the Americans with British backing in 1953. All this is now in the open on the Internet. Search for "1953 coup" so this wouldn't be a surprise if this document was fake. It does not matter, it is none of our business. Why should the US be involved in deciding if they should have nuclear power or not? Tell you why, we only want their oil and will persue our goals any way we can. Fact is we are the only nation to use a WMD on another nation so how does that make us the "sheriff"? We are very scary people, running around invading other countries on one pretext or another, so we can steal their stuff. I am ashamed of us.Given the that the USA lied and lied about WMD in Iraq , can we really believe anything they say ?? The biggest threat to world peace is you America!! and those who pull your strings in Israel !!! Why is it that western propaganda is so biased against Iran & its Nuclear path. Why isn't any of these Western countries talking about the Nuclear Armed state of Israel who weilds a heavy stick against the landless Palestinians who are oppressed & were displaced from their lands at the time of creation of the state if Israel in 1948 by the Western Powers.I think the Western powers & media are Pro Israel & Anti Arab & Islam. In short, the now presented documents (How an earth did they get them?) and the discovery of a "secret" nuclear facility (How did they find it?) reminds me strongly of the findings of WMD and biological weapons Mr. Powell presented at the UN to justify the long planned war on Iraq. The falcons in US want their next war. Iran may be a potential threat to the free flow of oil from the middle East and to US most important ally Israel. So it's time for another preemptive strike. more

Resolved Question: Why do the Jews already mentioned the " 6 millions " number many times before WWII?

As early as 1900, Rabbi Stephen Wise told a group of Zionists “there are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favour of Zionism" as reported in a the New York Times, June 11, 1900. In the 1912 American Jewish Year Book 5672, the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE reported that “Russia has since 1890 adopted a deliberate plan to expel or <exterminate> six millions of its people for no other reason than that they refuse to become members of the Greek Church, but prefer to remain Jews.” Other sources before WW2 speak of a Shoah of 6 Million, Shoah is the Hebrew word to Burn. It must also be remembered that the Zionist movement was beginning around this time, The propaganda would have been part of a deliberate plan to advance Zionism. Jews have always been adept at social manipulation and playing the victim. The 6 million number has been part of Jewish consciousness well before WW2 and could easily be the number decided on at the Nuremberg Trials for convenience purposes, only a few months after the end of WW2 the allies were able to come up with an exact Number of 6 million?. The truth is no one really knows, Red Cross figures put the concentration camp deaths at around 500,000. The presiding judge at the Nuremberg trial was told before hand in a New York hotel room by a group of Jewish lawyers that the charge of 6 million deaths was to be the Number that the Nazis were to be charged with (Private diary's of Robert Jackson). People will doubt a small lie but never a great lie. Page 482 of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 10th Edition 1902, under anti-Semitism , we can, at the bottom of the page, read : "While there are in Russia and Rumania six millions of Jews who are being systematically degraded..." Isn't this amazing that it was already question of 6 millions Jews in a " persecution " context way before WWI and WWII ( 1902 )? How can one understand this? Page 482 scanned : http://nsm88.org/articles/holohoax/encycbrit.html ******************************************************************************************************************* Not to forget that the number of supposed deaths in Auschwitz has varied from 1945 to 1995 between 8 million and 74.000 deads. But supprisingly, the 6 millions remained all those years, even when they changed the stones in Auschwitz in 1990 to decrease numbre of deads to 1.5 million ( previously it mentioned 4 millions ) Here is a chart who exposes ALL investigations done about number of deads in Auschwitz alleged " gas chambers ... http://mosaisk.com/auschwitz/Auschwitz-Number-of-Victims.php Holocaust/Shoah or HOLOHOAX ? more

Resolved Question: Are all anti-immigration groups part of the anti-immigration movement?

How do I find reliable information on illegal immigration that isn't part of this movement? The Anti-Immigration Movement The immigration debate in the United States has been marked by racist propaganda, bogus statistics about immigrants and wild conspiracy theories — all of which combine to dehumanize Latino immigrants and falsely portray them as disease-carrying, job-stealing criminals invading our country. This xenophobic rhetoric — echoes of the scapegoating of new immigrants throughout American history — has seeped steadily into the mainstream, taken up by right-wing politicians and popular media figures like Lou Dobbs. The myths and conspiracy theories about immigrants often originate within racist extremist organizations. And the vitriol heard daily on talk radio and cable TV has helped nurture a movement of anti-immigration groups as well as traditional hate groups. Many anti-immigrant groups — like the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) — present a veneer of respectability but are deeply rooted in the world of white supremacists. In fact, John Tanton, the founder of FAIR, is considered by many to be the father of the anti-immigration movement. At the same time that anti-immigrant rhetoric has grown more heated, violence against Latinos has grown. FBI statistics suggest that hate crimes against Latinos climbed 35 percent from 2003 to 2006. http://www.splcenter.org/intel/immigrant.jsp more

Resolved Question: Will Christianity survive if Israel is destroyed? Will America survive Obama?

The prediction in the Bible was that a messiah, or messenger, was to be sent by God to give self rule to the children of Israel. If an Antichrist (Muslim) were elected as American president because he pretended during the election to be Christian (even though clearly he casted aside his Christian name of Barry Soetero for Barack Hussein Obama ) and now admits to Arabs he still embraces the religion of his childhood and of the land where he was born, then what? Since in August Ob ama went so far as to appoint what he calls "devout Muslims" to Homeland Security posts... and two days ago he scolded Israel for building homes in their own nation because Arabs want to live there... - and he now neglects to place his hand over his heart along with everyone else during the recent memorial for our recently dead American soldiers- then what? If an Anti-Christ Muslim were to be elected president why woulld he not assist those of the "Death to America" sentiment and run up huge deficits, be in favor of abortion of our babies, force us to submit to bad health care, to please our enemies whom he loves because they are good devout Muslims who shout from every mountain top " DEATH TO ISRAEL AND DEATH TO AMERICA !" then what? After such a president were to attempt to disintegratesIsrael through clever propaganda convincing the world Isr4ael has no right to exist, then will he destroy America too so Arabs can leave their infertile deserts and take over the lands of the pilgrims pride, land where our father's died, and let, from every mountain side, the "sweetest sound he ever heard" (prayers to Allah) ring? If the Anti Christ wins, then it will mean that all the Biblical predictions lof what Jesus was supposed to accomplished has failed. And that he was not the savior because we were not deserving of being saved... then what?. Then why wouldn't Jews and Christians will all be put to the sword so that Arabs can move away from their infertile hostile deserts to our prairies and purple mountains, majesty, above the fruited plains? Then will good Christians, being given the choice between life as Muslims or death as Christians ,after their right to bear arms has been revoked and the New Muslim American regime sends their soldiers our doors... realize that because Jesus failed to accomplish what he was supposed to accomplish that he was a false messiah and join the Muslim religion to stay alive? Or will they gladly allow themselves to be beheaded, as according to Quran's instructions, hoping to be immediatgely accepted into heaven because they believe in Christ? more

Voting Question: HELP ME! PLEASE! SUMMARIZING!?

PLEASE HELP ME SUMMARIZE THIS! HAVANA, Cuba (Achieve3000, June 17, 2009). For the last five decades, relations between the U.S. and Cuba have been tense—and sometimes downright violent. In recent months, however, the governments of both nations have stated publicly that they are open to talks that might lead to at least partial reconciliation. Despite this development, people in both countries remain skeptical that relations will improve anytime soon. From the beginning of Fidel Castro's communist rule over Cuba, which began in 1959 after his military regime overthrew the government of Fulgencio Batista, relations between the U.S. and Cuba have been strained. In 1960, Castro angered U.S. leaders when he took control of the businesses operating in Cuba—including those belonging to U.S. companies—and failed to compensate the U.S. for its lost assets. The U.S. responded by imposing a trade embargo against Cuba. By 1962, the embargo banned nearly all trade with the country. In the 47 years since, relations have continued to be poor, due at least in part to the events surrounding the embargo. Yet there have been recent signs—on both sides—that tensions might be easing. For example, the U.S. erased restrictions on Americans who wish to visit or send money to relatives in Cuba. Meanwhile, President Barack Obama has announced that "the United States seeks a new beginning" with Cuba. Likewise, current Cuban president Raúl Castro, the brother of Fidel Castro, said he would be willing to negotiate everything with the U.S. This includes such thorny issues as freedom of the press, human rights, and the political prisoners that human rights observers say Cuba is holding. But no progress has been made in these areas. Many Cubans say this is because the U.S. embargo on Cuba is still in place. The Cuban government continues to speak out against the U.S. trade sanctions that it blames for frequent shortages of food, medicine, and other basic necessities that plague the island nation. "The cruel embargo against the Cuban people has cost lives, caused suffering, and also affected the economy, which sustains the nation. [The embargo also limits the nation's] possibilities to offer medical services, education, athletics, energy efficiency, and the protection of the environment," Fidel Castro wrote on a government Web site. President Obama says it is up to Cuba to embrace some reforms before bilateral relations can improve. He has pressed Cuba to release political prisoners and to afford greater freedoms to its citizens. Meanwhile, Cuba has yet to loosen restrictions on free speech, rights to assemble, and access to the Internet and other information sources that do not contain propaganda from Cuba's government. The government also continues to dominate the nation's economy, paying workers an average of $19.70 a month. Free enterprise, which might help ordinary citizens pull themselves out of poverty, is prohibited. Many people in both countries say they do not expect to see any significant progress soon. They say the Cuban government is unmotivated to make such changes. Fifty-year-old Rogelio Cardenas lives in Havana, Cuba's capital. "I'm not too optimistic," said Cardenas. He added that thousands of top government officials make comfortable livings fueled by official hostility toward the United States. They may not be ready to give that up, Cardenas said. Other Cuban citizens say that it is hard to ignore the actions that caused Cuba to mistrust the U.S. These actions include the embargo against Cuba, as well as attempts to overthrow various Latin American governments. "[The U.S.] toppled states in Guatemala, in Panama…and we don't even have to mention Girón," said 70-year-old retiree Chula Rodriguez, referring to a 1961 incident in which the U.S. helped Cuban exiles try to overthrow Fidel Castro's government, entering from the Bay of Pigs at Cuba's Girón Beach. Other Cubans believe that some Cuban-Americans living in the U.S. are creating barriers to improved relations between the two nations by encouraging the U.S. to halt negotiations with Cuba. They point out that many exiled Cubans living in Florida are part of an influential anti-Castro lobby. These exiles want Castro's government overthrown so that they may return to their former homes. Still other Cubans believe that even if the two countries improve relations, the lives of ordinary citizens will remain unchanged. "Let the United States come and discuss things with Cuba, but I don't see how that is going to help my life," said Juan, a 63-year-old retiree. Juan said he lives in a crowded three-room apartment with two of his sons, their wives, and two grandchildren. "There's no money, no space even, to live," he added. "Obama can't affect that." more

Resolved Question: CNN; Killings at the Canal?

CNN will present tonight the story of American soldiers found guilty for "murdering" Iraqis. Would that CNN find time for the soldier who around 2003 was killed when he threw his body on a hand grenade to protect his buddies. I guess that's not anti-American enough to satisfy their fan base? (My personal opinion, just typical left-wing, scum propaganda) more

Resolved Question: What Does Holocaust Denial Really Mean?

In April 2007 the European Union agreed to set jail sentences up to three years for those who deny or trivialize the Holocaust. More recently, in response to the remarks of Bishop Richard Williamson, the Pope has proclaimed that Holocaust denial is “intolerable and altogether unacceptable.” But what does Holocaust denial really mean? Begin with the word Holocaust. The Holocaust2 (spelled with a capital H) refers to the killing of six million Jews by the Nazis during World War II. It is supposed to be the German’s “Final Solution” to the Jewish problem. Much of the systematic extermination was to have taken place in concentration camps by shooting, gassing, and burning alive innocent Jewish victims of the Third Reich. People like Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, and Bishop Williamson who do not believe this account and who dare to say so in public are reviled as bigots, anti-Semites, racists, and worse. Their alternate historical scenarios are not termed simply revisionist, but are demeaned as Holocaust denial. Rudolf and Zundel were shipped to Germany where they were tried, convicted, and sentenced to three and five years, respectively. Williamson may not be far behind. Politicians deride Holocaust revisionist papers and conferences as “beyond the pale of international discourse and acceptable behavior.” Non-Zionist Jews who participate in such revisionism, like Rabbi Dovid Weiss of the Neturei Karta, are denounced as “self-haters” and are shunned and spat upon. Even Professor Norman Finkelstein, whose parents were both Holocaust survivors and who wrote the book, The Holocaust Industry, has been branded a Holocaust denier. But putting aside the virile hate directed against those who question the veracity of the typical Holocaust narrative, what is it that these people believe and say at the risk of imprisonment and bodily harm? For most Holocaust revisionists or deniers if you prefer, their arguments boil down to three simple contentions: 1. Hitler’s “Final Solution” was intended to be ethnic cleansing, not extermination. 2. There were no homicidal gas chambers used by the Third Reich. 3. There were fewer than 6 million Jews killed of the 55 million who died in WWII. Are these revisionist contentions so odious as to cause those who believe them to be reviled, beaten, and imprisoned? More importantly, is it possible that revisionist contentions are true, or even partially true, and that they are despised because they contradict the story of the Holocaust? Why can we deny the existence of God but are not allowed to ask questions about the accuracy of what happened during ww2? Is it really “beyond international discourse” to question the efficacy and the forensic evidence of homicidal gas chambers? If other myths, like making soap from human fat, have been dismissed as Allied war propaganda, why is it “unacceptable behavior” to ask if the gas chamber at Dachau was not reconstructed by the Americans because no other homicidal gas chamber could be found and used as evidence at the Nuremburg trials? The Holocaust story eliminates any comparison of Ketziot or Gaza to the concentration camps they indeed are. It memorializes the resistance of Jews in the ghettos of Europe while steadfastly denying any comparison with the resistance of Palestinians in Hebron and throughout the West Bank. It allows claims that this year’s Hanukah Massacre in Gaza, with a kill ratio of 100 to one, was a “proportionate response” to Palestinian resistance to unending occupation. One can't help wonder if “Remember the Holocaust” will be the battle cry of the next great clash of good (Judeo/Christian values) and evil (radical Islamic aggression) and those who question it must be demonized if not burned at the stake. If this line of inquiry is deemed "racist" then what can we ask? Anything? more

Resolved Question: Where is the Justice?

Are we driven by Media Propaganda? Has Media (Propaganda) found Nidal Hassan guilty? While the world community have divided their opinion to praise or condemn the act of Nidal Hassan. Are we driven by Media Propaganda in terms of finding out the truth about the incidents? Where there is increase of anti-American sentiments, Nidal is a hero, where there is raise of Islamophobia, Nidal is a murderer. Is this another controversial after Sep 11? My opinion, Nidal was a member of US Army, if he was affiliated with Al Qaida and was to be sent to Iraq, this would have been an opportunity for him to go and kill more soldiers in the War zone. US soldiers or Gov officials regardless of their religion are not trusted in many Muslim Communities, if we are not driven by Media then why should we look at the possibility that Nidal has served as US Army officer and he can be part of well trained CIA agent to run a Program of painting Islam bad colour? Senator Lie or Liebermann who is a master of sermon in this saga of Nidal is pure Orthodox Jew, What left for American Muslims? (Lieberman sponsored S.J. Res.46, the Senate version of H.J. Res. 114, that is, the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman more

Resolved Question: Are we driven by Media Propaganda?

While the world community have divided their opinion to praise or condemn the act of Nidal Hassan. Are we driven by Media Propaganda in terms of finding out the truth about the incidents? Where there is increase of anti-American sentiments, Nidal is a hero, where there is raise of Islamophobia, Nidal is a murderer. Is this another controversial after Sep 11? My opinion, Nidal was a member of US Army, if he was affiliated with Al Qaida and was to be sent to Iraq, this would have been an opportunity for him to go and kill more soldiers in the War zone. US soldiers or Gov officials regardless of their religion are not trusted in many Muslim Communities, if we are not driven by Media then why should we look at the possibility that Nidal has served as US Army officer and he can be part of well trained CIA agent to run a Program of painting Islam bad colour? Senator Lie or Liebermann who is a master of sermon in all this saga of Nidal is pure Orthodox Jew, What left for American Muslims? (Lieberman sponsored S.J. Res.46, the Senate version of H.J. Res. 114, that is, the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Lieberman more

Resolved Question: Why do Yahoo and Google Cooperate with China's Censorship Policies?

The level of Yahoo's cooperation is very evident, especially in this category where untra-nationalists and people most likely working for propaganda agencies are able to run amok. http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-06-19-our-view_x.htm Although this is a direct quite from "Community Guidelines", Yahoo seems to allow anti-American rants without reservation: "Yahoo! Answers isn't a soapbox to vent personal frustrations or rant about issues." How about it Yahoo, can you stick to your own commmunity guidelines and stop the anti-American rants in this category? more

Resolved Question: Without the advantage of 20/20 hind sight what could the Army have officially done to major Hasan?

What violation of the of the Uniform Code of Military Justice did he commit before the murderers? I have heard he did not want to go to Afghanistan. Not [wanting] to go to a combat zone is not a violation. A lot of men and women do not want to go. He made comments that the war on terror was "a war on Islam" He admitted he wrestled with what to tell fellow Muslim solders who had their doubts about fighting in Islamic countries. Some of his classmates they reported him for "anti-American propaganda," but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal complaint. If that is true that is not a case of the military trying to be politically correct. that is a case of unsat officers failing to do their duty. more

Resolved Question: Why are people having trouble thinking one of "our own" soldiers could snap, when maybe he was never one of us?

Is it not possible he put himself in this position for a reason?. Didn't the Muslim Pilots also take training here in the US to then later carry out their agenda?. In light of the new info, coming out on this man, isn't it obvious now this was in fact a terrorist attack?. FORT HOOD, Texas – In retrospect, the signs of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's growing anger over the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan seem unmistakable. In the months leading to Thursday's shooting spree that left 13 people dead and 29 others wounded, Hasan raised eyebrows with comments that the war on terror was "a war on Islam" "The system is not doing what it's supposed to do," said Dr. Val Finnell, who complained to administrators at a military university about what he considered Hasan's "anti-American" rants. "He at least should have been confronted about these beliefs, told to cease and desist, and to shape up or ship out." Finnell studied with Hasan from 2007-2008 in the master's program in public health at the military's Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md., where Hasan persistently complained about perceived anti-Muslim sentiment in the military and injected his politics into courses where they had no place "In retrospect, I'm not surprised he did it," Finnell said of the shootings. "I had real questions about what his priorities were, what his beliefs were." His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan's "anti-American propaganda," but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal complaint. Hasan reportedly jumped up on a desk and shouted "Allahu akbar!" — Arabic for "God is great!" — at the start of Thursday's attack. Please READ THE LAST TWO PARAGRAPHS AND TELL ME HOW THIS COULD NOT BE DEFINED AS ANYTHING BUT A TERRORIST ATTACK. more

Resolved Question: How can people still not call this act on Fort Hood a Terrorist attack?. These are the facts that stand out.?

After reading this please look up the definition for the word "terrorism", and you will see this act was done in the motive of his religion, which is one of the definitions of a motive for a terrorist attack. What he yells out before the shooting is all the proof we need. Also notice how Political Correctness kept his classmates from warning others, we should learn from this. Keeping our soldiers safe should have been more important than being PC. His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan's "anti-American propaganda," but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal complaint. Hasan reportedly jumped up on a desk and shouted "Allahu akbar!" — Arabic for "God is great!" — at the start of Thursday's attack. In retrospect, the signs of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's growing anger over the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan seem unmistakable. In the months leading to Thursday's shooting spree that left 13 people dead and 29 others wounded, Hasan raised eyebrows with comments that the war on terror was "a war on Islam" more

Resolved Question: is this what america has come down to people scared to make a complaint because of fear of being acused of?

discrimination? FORT HOOD, Texas – There was the classroom presentation that justified suicide bombings. Comments to colleagues about a climate of persecution faced by Muslims in the military. Conversations with a mosque leader that became incoherent. As a student, some who knew Nidal Malik Hasan said they saw clear signs the young Army psychiatrist — who authorities say went on a shooting spree at Fort Hood that left 13 dead and 29 others wounded — had no place in the military. After arriving at Fort Hood, he was conflicted about what to tell fellow Muslim soldiers about the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, alarming an Islamic community leader from whom he sought counsel. "I told him, `There's something wrong with you,'" Osman Danquah, co-founder of the Islamic Community of Greater Killeen, told The Associated Press on Saturday. "I didn't get the feeling he was talking for himself, but something just didn't seem right." Danquah assumed the military's chain of command knew about Hasan's doubts, which had been known for more than a year to classmates in a graduate military medical program. His fellow students complained to the faculty about Hasan's "anti-American propaganda," but said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim student kept officers from filing a formal written complaint. more

Resolved Question: Why do so many people believe the theory of evolution to be a fact when all of the evidence denies it?

I would point out the many fallacies of the theory but that would just lead to people arguing with points that have been brain washed into people's head by Darwinist propaganda. I will however list a few quotes from well-known specialists in their field who did at one point support the theory of evolution and might know a little more about it than the average person. Prof. Derek Ager, who is the former president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (and head of the department of geology and oceanography at University College of Swansea): It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as a student . . . have now been debunked. Derek Ager, “The Nature of the Fossil Record.” Proceedings of the Geological Association, Vol. 87, No. 2, 1976, p. 132. Jerry Coyne is of the Chicago University Evolution and Ecology Department: We conclude—unexpectedly—that there is little evidence for the neo-Darwinian view: its theoretical foundations and the experimental evidence supporting it are weak. H.A. Orr and Jerry Coyne (1992), “The Genetics of Adaptation: A Reassessment,” American Naturalist, pp. 140, 726. Dr. Albert Fleischman, zoologist at the University of Erlangen: The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination. November 1981 Presentation at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson, is a Swedish geneticist and Professor of Botany at the University of Lund in Sweden: My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. At least I should hardly be accused of having started from any preconceived anti-evolutionary standpoint. Roger Lewin, In the Age of Mankind, Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Books, 1988. p. 22. Paul Lemoine, a former Director of the National Museum of Natural History at Paris: The theories of evolution in which our student youth was cradled constitute a dogma that all the world continues to teach. But each in his own specialty, zoologist or botanist, comes to the conclusion that none of the available explanations is adequate. . . . The result of this summary is that the theory of evolution is impossible. Heribert Nilsson, Synthetische Artbildung (lund, Swewden: Verlag CWK Gleerup, 1953), p. 31. Christopher Wills Norman Macbeth, a Harvard-trained lawyer, has made the study of Darwinian theory his avocation for many years: Unfortunately, in the field of evolution most explanations are not good. As a matter of fact, they hardly qualify as explanations at all; they are suggestions, hunches, pipe dreams, hardly worthy of being called hypotheses. Introduction: De (Evolution), Encyclopedie Française, Vol. 5 (1937) p. 6. H. S. Lipson, the British physicist: I have always been slightly suspicious of the theory of evolution because of its ability to account for any property of living beings (the long neck of the giraffe, for example).I have therefore tried to see whether biological discoveries over the last thirty years or so fit in with Darwin’s theory. I do not think that they do. To my mind, the theory does not stand up at all. H. S. Lipson, “A Physicist Look at Evolution,” Physics Bulletin, 31 (1980), p. 138 Gregory Alan Pesely is Professor of Philosophy: One would immediately reject any lexicographer who tried to define a word by the same word, or a thinker who merely restated his proposition, or any other instance of gross redundancy; yet no one seems scandalized that men of science should be satisfied with a major principle which is no more than a tautology. G.A. Peseley, “The Epistemological Status of Natural Selection,” Laval Theologique et Philosophique, Vol. 38 (Feb. 1982), p. 74. Dr. Colin Patterson is an evolutionist paleontologist and curator of London’s Natural History Museum, editor of the museum’s journal and author of the book Evolution: Now, one of the reasons I started taking this anti-evolutionary view—well, let’s callt non-evolutionary—was [that] last year I had a sudden realization. For over twenty years, I had thought that I was working on evolution in some way. One morning I woke up, and something had happened in the night, and it struck me that I had been working on this stuff for twenty years, and there was not one thing I knew about it. That was quite a shock, to learn that one can be so misled for so long. . . So for the last few weeks, I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people and groups of people. The question is this: ‘Can you tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing, any one thing that you think is true? Is there one thing you can tell me about evolution?’ I tried this question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology seminar in the University of Chicago— a very prestigious body of evolutionists—and all I got there was silence for a long time. But eventually one person said, ‘I do know one thing—it ought not to be taught in high school.’ Dr. Colin Patterson, “Evolution and Creationism: Can You Tell Me Anything About Evolution?” Prof. Fred Hoyle is a British astronomer and a mathematician at Cambridge University: Indeed, such a theory (that life was assembled by an intelligence) is so obvious that one wonders why it is not widely accepted as being self-evident. The reasons are psychological rather than scientific. Fred Hoyle, Chandra Wickramasinghe, Evolution from Space, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984, p. 130. By the way I am not like other Muslims and I do not bow down when I pray. I like up to the sky as God is far above what you associate with Him. To you be your religion and to me be mine.volutionary Morphology seminar in the University of Chicago— a very prestigious body of evolutionists—and all I got there was silence for a long time. But eventually one person said, ‘I do know one thing—it ought not to be taught in high school.’ Dr. Colin Patterson, “Evolution and Creationism: Can You Tell Me Anything About Evolution?” Prof. Fred Hoyle is a British astronomer and a mathematician at Cambridge University: Indeed, such a theory (that life was assembled by an intelligence) is so obvious that one wonders why it is not widely accepted as being self-evident. The reasons are psychological rather than scientific. Fred Hoyle, Chandra Wickramasinghe, Evolution from Space, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984, p. 130. By the way I am not like other Muslims and I do not bow down when I pray. I look up to the Heavens when I pray as God is far above what you associate with Him. To you be your religion and to me be mine.There is much evidence that refutes the theory. Such as fossils from the early Cambrian period which scientists agree appeared Ina short geological time frame of 5 to 10 million years. Around 50 phyla emerged with no evolutionary ancestors. They possesed complex features and organs, were spread throught the world and were vastly different. The argument that their ancestors had soft-shelled bodies and could not be preserved does not hold up because many of their soft tissue features had been preserved and many pre-Cambrian fossils have been found as well as single cell organsims with soft tissue from 3.5 billion years ago. Furthermore, the fossils such as trilobytes show no type of change from when they first appear to the last time they appear in the fossil record. Scientists do not want to admit evolution is defeated because of their adherence to a materialist view of the world. That's why the discovery of Cambrian fossils that contradicted the theory was covered up for 70 years. more

Voting Question: Is race-baiting/fighting nothing more than a distraction?

Isn't racist propaganda (whether it's anti-black or anti-white) nothing more than a smokescreen...a DISTRACTION from the real issues that face Americans? We know that (historically) the super rich don't necessairily care about the poor, working-class or even the middle-class and that (historically) poorer whites have been just as "disposable". Isn't it a waste of time and a grand deception for average Americans to engage in petty race-baiting and fighting against each other, when we're really all in the same boat?Fenway, I didn't say racism doesn't exist. That wasn't my point. Is it a DISTRACTION...a smokescreen to mask the bigger picture from us. You see? That was/is my point.devon, a bit over the top, aren't you? If you're trying to make a point. It look like you're making a smokescreen. You sound phoney. Maybe you really do believe that what I said is true. Are you a fascist pig?DeeGirl, maybe people can't get past it because the fire is always being fed fuel--much of it by the mass media. Sounds like an organized effort, doesn't it? For some, racism becomes like a drug. It compensates shortcomings for some and for others gives them a delusional, false sense of "power". But the main point is that the race-baiting propaganda pimps are always busy keeping racism alive. They won't stop the race fear mongering--this being ESPECIALLY aimed at whites, and now even at black/white biracials. more

Voting Question: Should the Military be investigating its own for Enemies. like a simple google search?

to see if its own members are posting anti american propaganda and especially anti military and sympathetic views towards the enemies of the USA more

Resolved Question: Can anyone honestly say Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan isn't just another cowardly Islamic terrorist?

The Mainstream Media Propaganda Machine says he has "Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome", but he was never in combat. He gave away copies of the Koran He attacked unarmed soldiers trapped in a waiting room. He screamed Allahu Akbar (Arabic for God is Great) just before opening fire on the trapped unarmed soldiers. How much proof do you need to know he is just another terrorist? What excuses will the media come up with to excuse his evil behavior? How long will our military commanders keep using Political Correctness as an excuse to fast-track anti-American nut-jobs into positions of high pay and high authority when there is a chain of evidence he should have been removed form military service years ago?To japayne13... You are ignorant. A Muslim is an adherent of Islam. Islam is the religious faith of Muslims. Read your dictionary before making a fool of yourself.The truth of my statements are coming out. Keep tuned to sources that are not run by the mainstream media propaganda machine to get the full story. I wonder what BBC News will say tonight and what will be on America's Public Broadcasting news tomorrow. You all saw the incorrect information that came out yesterday. They will get the whole truth out eventually.Even the mainstream propaganda machine talks about "self-appointed" or "self-motivated" terrorists. They operate independent of any terrorist cell and without official backing from organized terrorists.By calling Maj. Hasan a terrorist I did not intend to imply he is a member of a Terrorist Cell. I was using the term in the broader defined sense of the word referring to the tactics he was using and to his actions which indicate where his motivation lies. more

Voting Question: Who said the following statements?

Take this simple quiz, the person who scores highest gets an easy 10 points. Question #1: Following up on the examples at the top of the page, who touted “basic” medical services "that ensure healthy future generations, ensure development of practical reasoning skills, and ensure full and active participation by citizens in public deliberations"…while…"services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed". A) Dr. Joseph Mengele B) Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel C) Dr. Phil Question #2: Who said: “We’re going to have to, if you’re very old, we’re not going to give you all that technology and all those drugs for the last couple of years of your life to keep you maybe going for another couple of months. It’s too expensive…so we’re going to let you die.” A) Adolph Hitler B) Robert “Thousand Year” Reich C) Reich Marshall Hermann “Meier” Goring Question #3: Which national leader smoked cigarettes? A) Fidel Castro B) Barack Obama C) Adolph Hitler Question #4: Who used the slogan: “Public need before private greed." A) The Democrat Party B) George Soros (Same as A) C) Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels Question #5: Who believed: “Not every item of news should be published. Rather must those who control news policies endeavor to make every item of news serve a certain purpose.” A) Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Gobbels B) MSNBC Propaganda Minister Chris Matthews C) William Randolph Hearst Question #6: Who admonished that, “A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and government.” A) Nazi Propaganda Minister Goebbels B) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Czar Cass Sunstein C) CBS Propaganda Minister Katie Couric Question #7: Who envisioned his administration embarking upon a new direction, saying, “The world shall open up for everyone. Privileges for individuals, the tyranny of certain nations and their financial rulers shall fall. And last of all this year will help to provide the foundations of a real understanding among peoples, and with it the certainty of conciliation among nations.” A) Adolph Hitler B) Barack Hussein Obama C) George W. Bush Question #8. Who said: “I see no reason why this war must go on” A) Adolph Hitler B) Cindy Sheehan C) Barack Hussein Obama Question #9: Who believed that: “Words build bridges into unexplored regions.” A) Barack Hussein Obama B) Unrepentant Terrorist and Obama auto-biographer Bill Ayers C) Adolf Hitler Question #10: Which anti-Semite said: “Do you know some of these satanic Jews have taken over [national healthy lifestyle foundation]?... Everything that we built, they have. The mind of Satan now is running the [industries]. And they make us look like we’re the murderers; we look like we’re the gangsters…” A) Adolph Hitler B) SS Reichfuhrer Heinrich Himmler C) Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan Question #11: Which organization demanded the “nationalization of all previous associated industries and trusts” and “a division of the profits of all heavy industries”? A) The Young Communists B) Service Employees International Union C) The Nazi Party Question #12: Who presented a world leader with a child and said: “Here stands a youth -- a youth that does not know class and caste. Behind you, follows the young generation of our people. Because you are the greatest example of unselfishness in this nation, this young generation wants to be unselfish too.” A) Hitler Youth founder Baldur von Schirach B) Secretary of Education Arne Duncan C) Safe School Czar & Gay Rights Activist Kevin Jennings Question #13: Who said: “I pledge to be a servant of our leader.” A) Demi Moore B) Reich Marshall Herman “Meier” Goering C) Both Question #14: Who believed: "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We have got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." A) Adolph Hitler B) Barack Hussein Obama C) SA Brownshirt organizer Ernst Rohm Question #15: How about: "Our destiny as [Germans or Americans] is tied up with one another. If we are less respected in the world, then you will be less safe." A) Barack Hussein Obama B) Adolph Hitler C) Kalifornia Obergruppenfuhrer Ahnold Schwarzenegger Question #16: Who once said: “We have only one task, to stand firm and carry on the racial struggle.” A) Barack Hussein Obama B) The Reverend Jesse Jackson C) SS Reich Minister Heinrich Himmler Question #17: Who made the proclamation: "The world must stand together to demonstrate that international law is not an empty promise and that more

Resolved Question: is the flu vacine spiritual wickdedness in high places?

alex jones says yes, there is something called Eugenics and he says its evil Anti christian conpiracy to undermine american freedom and even to murder people by design listen to this audio clip about a propaganda song being shown to children. hyping the flu shot as a good thing but alex jones saying it is evil http://cid-fff19b48ee821aa4.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/ic%2015/vacineSongJone32.wma listen to the end of the clip itselfEph. 6: 12 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. more

Resolved Question: Should there be a stop to all dog/cat breeding in America?

HSUS is the 'Humane Society of the United States.' It is supported mainly by small donations from millions of Americans because it has been almost 100% successful at selling itself as 'for the animals.' However, it's more accurately thought of as a business that provides the animal rights movement with the service of squeezing rights to use animals, than as an organization that helps animals. HSUS is not connected with any animal shelters or direct animal welfare activities. Of top 12 HSUS Animal Stories of 2005 (grey wolves, abused tigers, pet cloning, Internet hunting, dove hunts, animal fighting, seal hunts, laying hens, trophy hunting, the HSUS-Fund For Animals merger, Katrina relief and horse slaughter), only hurricane relief had to do with helping Fido or Fluffy as promoted in their materials. HSUS is devoted to making animal use (including pet ownership) steadily more difficult and expensive. Its main actions divide into: (a) Promoting laws to restrict use/ownership, (b) propaganda in support of such laws, and (c) fundraising/self-promotional actions. You will look in vain for an HSUS action that makes animal use or pet ownership easier, more common, more fun, or more successful. Specific campaigns include anti-hunting, anti-meat farming and meat eating (the organization's headquarters forbids animal products), anti-pet breeding (it was the chief promoter of the so-called 'Pet Animal Welfare Statute' or PAWS), anti-circus/rodeo, and anti-animal use medical and other research. So is this a good thing or bad thing for America? Life without pets? more

Resolved Question: What did the Russian youth think of us Americans during the 80's cold war?

I remember everything from TV, video games, posters, propaganda, we even had anti-russian stickers in my grocery store. You guys were portrayed as the ultimate source of evil. And I can not lie, I believed it. But I always was secretly interested in Russian culture too. Your jets, those dolls that get smaller and smaller, the language, that crazy Cyrillic alphabet of yours. I was wondering what you thought of us? more

Resolved Question: What's this hysteria over the BNP? Who are they anyway?

I'm an american. I never heard of the BNP until a few weeks ago. I wanted to hear that old Paul McCartney song "Let 'Em In" so I pulled up a video on youtube. What I got was some kind of anti-immigration propaganda to the song. I wasn't expecting that, and it was kind of hilarious. It had a link to their website, and I clicked on it, but, I got bored and logged off. Anyway, today everything on Answers is about the BNP. So who are they? What's going on with them?Jack- you're a jack*ss Look out for snakes- Haha! That's BP! Geri- I do watch the news, they're not covering it in the US. more

Resolved Question: Was America verified in its imperial efforts from 1890-1910?

I hav to make a political cartoon including any of these countries.. Philippines, Cuba, Alaska, China, Latin America,Guam, Puerto Rico And any of these topics...White Man's Burden, Expansionism, Yellow Journalism/Propaganda, USS Maine, Colonies, Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, American Anti-Imperialism League, Little Brown Brother Please give me some ideas!!! Thank you! more

Resolved Question: Should the government shut down Fox News for spreading terrorist propaganda?

Fox News has an open anti-American agenda and always seems to support terrorist. They even sided with Al Qaeda over the Presidents Nobel Peace prize God bless more

Resolved Question: What do you think of the governments latest anti American video which calls every American a terrorist?

type in: the cell john elway on youtube and select the 8 signs toward terrorism propaganda video. What do you think, funny how it is all white and black Americans. Anyone see where this is going besides me? BTW, YA doesn't allow links anymore apparently...once again three liberal loons answered, none of which allow personal email. I know very well how to spell soldier, and how to be one. I also know a play on words when I see one, like old soul aka being a soldier makes the soul feel old. your small brain could not comprehend that of course. more

Resolved Question: What do you think of the governments latest anti American which calls everyone in the US a terrorist video?

Resolved Question: Is the consensus reality often deliberately misleading?

Notice how people are called the following canned insults when the challenge mainstream media propaganda messages? + tin hat + paranoid + unprofessional + unqualified + cool aide drinker + Luddite + spoiler (AKA Ralph Nader) + wasted vote getter + activist + publicity seeker + friend of the terrorist + anti-American George Orwell would be impressed at the sleek propaganda machine known as US mass media and Hollywood movies. Do you belief that mass media in your country has earned the trust and respect of the people? Is the audience otherwise influenced despite their suspicions? more

Resolved Question: Did the NRA call you tonight?

They called me. Man they have their panties in a bunch. Feeding a well scripted load of misinformation about 3rd world dictators and their leader (Hillary Clinton, of course) aimed at disarming America... completely. Talk about a good laugh... I really just tore some dope a new one. Sadly, I am hunter, former competitive shooter, plinker and armed security guard. I own a safe full of guns. I've never been a member of the NRA. I find their hysteria laughable, you see I grew up in East Germany and grew up on a steady diet of anti-American propaganda. While NOBODY believed it, we dare not say what we felt out loud, because we didn't want to hauled in by the Stasi. The NRA reminds me of my childhood in 1970's East Germany. They really go a long way to make things up, then relieve you from burdensome thinking, by telling you what to think. Anyone else get the feeling they are desperate liars? Why or why not. Answer quickly, this question certainly will be reported by NRA stooges almost instantly. I will appeal and it will be restored. Watch. more

Resolved Question: How do you feel about California lawmakers want to suspend ALL immigration laws?

California State Senator Gilbert Cedillo-D put forth a resolution that passed in the California Senate condemning specified policies and practices of federal agencies regarding the enforcement of immigration laws. Furthermore Cedillo’s resolution urges Congress and President Obama to declare an immediate moratorium on immigration policies and practices until a comprehensive reform of immigration is enacted. Although a Joint Senate Resolution does not have the force of law, it is voted on in both California Houses. This resolution has passed in a partisan Democrat vote. The resolution is not typically sent to the Governors desk. Most would consider the document more of a hopeful resolution. The first paragraph of the resolution reads, “The State of California values all of its residents, whether they be citizens, legal residents, or undocumented immigrants, and strives to enable all residents to work and live free from discrimination, exploitation, and repressive federal immigration enforcement.” However Congressman Brian Bilbray-R Calif. reminds Sen. Cedillo that this resolution breaks the laws of the Constitution. “He should look up the separation of powers section and this resolution is nothing more than political posturing.” According to Sen. Cedillo’s Press Secretary Xochitl Arellano, Senator Cedillo who campaigned with President Obama has now officially put the President on notice. “The electronic raids have to stop.” There are hundreds of undocumented workers losing their jobs on a moments notice, Arellano points out. “The Obama Administration must stop E-Verify, period.” When asked about the California’s double-digit unemployment rate and the difficulty U.S. citizens’ face Arellano says, “We are not responding to that and it doesn’t matter.” This resolution will surely create a firestorm of backlash from those who demand enforcement of state and federal immigration laws. One such opponent is State Assemblyman Martin Garrick-R Carlsbad. “ It’s ridiculous and Assemblyman Garrick has tried numerous times to strengthen immigration laws and how to better identify the ones who reside in the jail system,” says Mike Zimmerman, press secretary for Garrick. “However, the make up of the state legislation makes it difficult to get any meaningful reform through.” Zimmerman continues to say a moratorium on immigration enforcement would be a public safety threat and should be very concerning for all citizens in the country. Tactics like these doesn’t come as a surprise from anti-amnesty and secure border groups like the Minutemen. "Gil Cedillo has long been a strong advocate for Mexican illegal aliens, but this crosses the line and is a direct attack on American citizens and taxpayers. Cedillo does not speak for most Californians with his seditious words and radical propaganda," says Jeff Schwilk, Founder of the San Diego Minutemen. On a national level, immigration organizations that study the issues and their affect on the U.S. population like Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) view Cedillo’s action as unacceptable. “In the wake of busts across the country of 'separate, unrelated' terrorism busts of individuals who are mostly foreign born, California wants to replace some semblance of order provided by solid programs like E-Verify and 287(g) that better help us find out who is authorized to be here and who has and has not broken the law, with blinders. What are California lawmakers thinking? Would it matter if the Dallas bomber was the LA bomber instead?” Janice Kephart, Director of National Security Policy for CIS said. To read Senate Joint Resolution 19; info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sjr_19_bill_20090903_introduced.pdf http://www.examiner.com/x-10317-San-Diego-County-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m9d29-California-lawmakers-want-to-suspend-ALL-immigration-laws more

Resolved Question: Does anyone else think that all of this "anti-smoking" propaganda is complete bullsh*t?

Our founding fathers smoked POT and cigarettes. In fact, the first American flag was made of hemp. Do any other pot smokers/cig smokers think that it is ridiculous that in America the biggest issues that we are facing are how to keep gays from getting married, how to keep people from finding out the truth about marijuana's health benefits, how to keep people from smoking, how to keep people from finding out about safe sex and how to use condoms, etc. Does anyone else think that our forefathers/founding fathers would just give up and shoot themselves in the face if they lived in our current society? 1. Are there any other people who feel the same way as me? 2. Do you think that gays should have the right to get married? 3. Do you think that pot should be decriminalized? 4. What's your favorite brand of cigarettes (if you smoke)? more

Voting Question: can anyone help with my american history study guideee?

how did the outcome of the french and indian war negatively impact england? what was the purpose of the proclamation of 1763? why was the townsend act illigatemate? define propaganda? how was the boston masacre used as propaganda? how did the british respond to the boston tea parTy? describe the battle of lexington? what major decisions were made at the second continental congress? what was the olive branch petition what is a natural right what does the declaration state about slavery? what happennd in york town list three enumerated powers how can the u.s change the constitution? what did anti federalist believe in? more

Resolved Question: Is Michael Moore a greedy capitalist exploiting the untapped market for leftist anti-American propaganda films?

Voting Question: Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?

This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to declare a ‘Middle Eastern conspiracy’ behind the attack. The culprit was later identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces. Let us analyze this allegation of ‘fundamentalism’ and ‘terrorism’: 1. Definition of the word ‘fundamentalist’ A fundamentalist is a person who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of the doctrine or theory he is following. For a person to be a good doctor, he should know, follow, and practise the fundamentals of medicine. In other words, he should be a fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a good mathematician, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics. For a person to be a good scientist, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of science. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of science. 2. Not all ‘fundamentalists’ are the same One cannot paint all fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot categorize all fundamentalists as either good or bad. Such a categorization of any fund amentalist will depend upon the field or activity in which he is a fundamentalist. A fundamentalist robber or thief causes harm to society and is therefore undesirable. A fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits society and earns much respect. 3. I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world. There is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or is against the interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour misconceptions about Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be unfair or improper. This is due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam. If one critically analyzes the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot escape the fact that Islam is full of benefits both at the individual and collective levels. 4. Dictionary meaning of the word ‘fundamentalist’ According to Webster’s dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ was a movement in American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes. According to the Oxford dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ means ‘strict maintenance of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam’. Today the moment a person uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim who is a terrorist. 5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word ‘terrorist’ is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people. 6. Different labels given to the same individual for the same action, i.e. ‘terrorist’ and ‘patriot’ Before India achieved independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of India who did not subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the British government. The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the same activities and hailed as ‘patriots’. Thus two different labels have been given to the same people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a terrorist while the other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain had a right to rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who were of the view that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and freedom fight more

Resolved Question: Why would anyone support PETA and their INSANE beliefs?

1) PETA president and co-founder Ingrid Newkirk has described her group's overall goal as "total animal liberation." This means no meat, no milk, no zoos, no circuses, no wool, no leather, no hunting, no fishing, and no pets (not even seeing-eye dogs). PETA is also against all medical research that requires the use of animals. 2) Despite its constant moralizing about the "unethical" treatment of animals by restaurant owners, grocers, farmers, scientists, anglers, and countless other Americans, PETA has killed over 14,400 dogs and cats at its Norfolk, Virginia headquarters. During 2005, PETA put to death over 90 percent of the animals it collected from members of the public. 3) PETA has given tens of thousands of dollars to convicted arsonists and other violent criminals. This includes a 2001 donation of $1,500 to the North American Earth Liberation Front (ELF), an FBI-certified "domestic terrorist" group responsible for dozens of firebombs and death threats. During the 1990s, PETA paid $70,200 to an Animal Liberation Front (ALF) activist convicted of burning down a Michigan State University research laboratory. In his sentencing recommendation, a federal prosecutor implicated PETA president Ingrid Newkirk in that crime. And PETA vegetarian campaign coordinator Bruce Friedrich told an animal rights convention in 2001 that "blowing stuff up and smashing windows" is "a great way to bring about animal liberation." 4) PETA activists regularly target children as young as six years old with anti-meat and anti-milk propaganda, often waiting outside their schools to intercept them as they walk to and from class-without notifying parents. One piece of kid-targeted PETA literature tells small children: "Your Mommy Kills Animals!" PETA brags that its messages reach more